MLOps & Data Engineering
Reproducible pipelines, feature stores, training-to-serving continuity, and monitoring you can trust. We make models observable, versioned, and boring to operate, the way production should be.
One ladder, four stages. Each is fixed in scope, ends in something you keep, and earns the next. You can stop after any stage and walk away with the deliverables. That's the point.
Two weeks, one question: is machine learning worth it here? We audit the data you hold, the hardware you run, and the regulatory boundary you operate in, then tell you honestly what ML can and can't do for the use case, and what it would return.
One use case from the roadmap, taken to a working prototype on your data and your infrastructure. Before we start, we agree the success metric in writing (accuracy, latency, cost, whatever the business actually needs), and the pilot is evaluated against it, in the open.
The pilot becomes a system. We build the pipelines, harden the serving layer, and put the models into production where your data already lives (on-prem, private cloud, or at the edge), with monitoring, rollback, and reproducibility from day one.
Models drift, data changes, regulation moves. We monitor, retrain, and improve the system, while deliberately training your team to take it over. The retainer is designed to shrink: success is your engineers not needing us on the phone.
Whatever the stage, the same three disciplines do the work, and the same principle applies: everything runs on infrastructure you control.
Reproducible pipelines, feature stores, training-to-serving continuity, and monitoring you can trust. We make models observable, versioned, and boring to operate, the way production should be.
Inference where the data is created: on devices, factory floors, and private networks. We quantize, distill, and optimize models to run fast on constrained hardware, with no round-trip to anyone's cloud.
The EU AI Act and GDPR turned into engineering decisions: data lineage, model documentation, risk classification, and audit trails built into the system, so governance is provable, not promised. Assessments run on Quince Audit, the platform we built for our own auditors.
We map every AI system on five rungs of control, from Exposed to Owned. The Sprint tells you which rung you stand on today. The stages above are the climb.
Not every need starts with a sprint. We also embed specialists in your team, run AI compliance audits on our own platform, and build products on our own edge stack, starting with MQ Flow. Expand each for detail.
A Quince specialist works from inside your team, not a delivery pod at arm's length. They join your standups, read your codebase, and own outcomes next to your own people. Engage one for a two-week spike or a year-long build.
You buy a package of consultant hours. Our assessors bring Quince Audit, the compliance-assessment platform we built and run ourselves, and it absorbs the manual work those hours used to disappear into: reading evidence, drafting the assessment, chasing the missing documents, and keeping every conclusion traceable back to the file it came from. Because the platform is ours, there are no extra licences to buy.
The AI reads the evidence and proposes a verdict with its reasoning. An assessor confirms every one of them. The proposal is a first pass, never the decision, and it is visible to our assessors rather than to the people who uploaded the documents.
MQ Flow runs a building's heating, ventilation, and humidity from a physics model of human comfort, then learns what the people in each room actually prefer. Occupants never set a temperature. They tap warmer or cooler, and the system does the rest. We build the AI and the software; our HVAC partner Mifimi brings the domain expertise that makes it real in a plant room.
A Fanger PMV comfort model (ISO 7730) computes each room's comfort target from temperature, radiant heat, humidity, and air movement. It works from day one, before any learning.
Per-room reinforcement learning turns warmer and cooler taps into a personal comfort offset, tuning to the actual people in the room rather than a statistical average.
The same comfort can be reached several ways. The optimiser adjusts fresh air and humidity before touching the heat pump, targeting at least 30% lower energy use.
The ML Feasibility Sprint is the lowest-risk way to find out whether machine learning is worth it for your use case: fixed scope, published price, and a report you keep either way.